Which source would best help a historian understand how the Great Chicago Fire affected families?

A. A biography of a Chicago family displaced by the fire
B. A letter from a grandmother in New York to her family in Chicago
C. A newspaper editorial about families who were displaced
D. An oral history dictated by an adolescent who fled the fire

D) primary sources are much more accurate because they come directly from the source.

Answered by nes | 2024-06-10

An oral history dictated by an adolescent who fled the fire is the source that would best help a historian understand how the Great Chicago Fire affected families. Option D is correct.
Historians may use primary source which consists on written or created source by a person who saw a historical event. Letters, diaries, speeches, and photographs are examples of primary sources. Artifacts such as tools are also primary sources. Other tools that historians use are secondary sources.

Answered by ailud18 | 2024-06-12

The chosen option, D, is the best source for understanding how the Great Chicago Fire affected families, as oral histories offer personal, first-hand accounts of experiences during the fire. These narratives capture emotions and details that other sources may miss, providing a deeper understanding of the impact on individuals and families. In contrast, options A, B, and C, are secondary sources that lack the immediacy and emotional insights provided by oral histories.
;

Answered by ailud18 | 2024-08-17