Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states' ability to:
A. protect protestors.
B. restrict the freedom of assembly.
C. convict criminals.
D. restrict the freedom of the press.
Answer (2)
Edwards v. South Carolina is significant as it limited states' ability to restrict peaceful protests, thus strengthening the protection of the freedom of assembly under the First Amendment. This ruling underscored that peaceful demonstrators cannot be criminalized for expressing their views in public spaces. The case set an important precedent for future civil rights protections. ;
Edwards v. South Carolina is significant as it limited states' ability to restrict the freedom of assembly, affirming the protection of peaceful protests under the First Amendment. This landmark ruling underscored the importance of allowing individuals to express their views peacefully in public spaces. Therefore, the best answer is B. restrict the freedom of assembly.
;
