Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common?
A. The government has a heavy burden to prove harm.
B. The government can limit speech that causes harm.
C. The government has unlimited power to limit speech.
D. The government must follow the First Amendment.
Answer (2)
The Schenck and New York Times cases highlight different aspects of free speech limitations. Schenck established that the government carries a heavy burden to demonstrate harm for speech limitations, while New York Times underscored the robust protections for press freedom. Together, they illustrate the complexities of balancing national safety with individual rights under the First Amendment. ;
Both Schenck v. United States and New York Times Co. v. United States address the limits of free speech under the First Amendment. They share the theme that the government must currently have a heavy burden to show harm before imposing restrictions on speech. Therefore, the best option would be A: The government has a heavy burden to prove harm.
;
