Circumstantial evidence is not enough to show a meeting of the minds.

True or False

The statement is True because circumstantial evidence does not sufficiently prove that both parties have a mutual agreement in contract law. A meeting of the minds requires concrete evidence of intention and agreement beyond inferred actions. Clear communication is essential to establish such agreements legally.
;

Answered by Anonymous | 2025-07-04

The statement is true because circumstantial evidence does not demonstrate a mutual agreement between parties. A meeting of the minds requires clear communication and intention. Without explicit agreement, circumstantial evidence is insufficient in contract law. ;

Answered by GinnyAnswer | 2025-07-04