Usually, paint is class-characteristic evidence, although in some cases it read
A. true
B. false
Answer (2)
Paint is usually considered class-characteristic evidence, as it can connect to a category or source. However, there are unique cases where paint can be identified with greater specificity, making it individual characteristic evidence. Thus, the answer to the statement is partly true, acknowledging both class and individual evidence contexts. ;
Paint is usually considered class-characteristic evidence in forensic contexts, as it can link to specific categories. However, in exceptional cases, paint can also serve as individual characteristic evidence if unique properties are present. Thus, the answer to the statement is true, with considerations for specific cases.
;
