The structural-functional approach to religion is criticized for ignoring how religion can generate social conflict. This approach tends to focus on the positive social functions of religion while overlooking its potential to create divisions. Recognizing these aspects is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the role of religion in society. ;
The criticism of the structural-functional approach to religion is that it ignores how religion can generate social conflict (C). This approach tends to focus on the positive aspects of religion while overlooking its role in creating divisions. A comprehensive understanding of religion must address both its cohesive and potentially divisive functions.
;