Voter turnout in states with EDR was higher than in states without EDR in both 2008 and 2012.
In 2008, the difference in voter turnout was 72% − 62% = 10% .
In 2012, the difference in voter turnout was 65% − 58% = 7% .
Therefore, election-day registration helped to increase voter turnout. It helped to increase voter turnout.
Explanation
Understand the problem and provided data We are given a table that shows voter turnout in states with and without Election-Day Registration (EDR) for the years 2008 and 2012. Our goal is to determine what conclusion can be drawn about election-day registration in states where it was an option, based on the provided data.
Compare voter turnout in 2008 Let's compare the voter turnout in states with EDR to those without EDR for both years.
In 2008: States with EDR: 72% States without EDR: 62%
The difference is 72% − 62% = 10% . This means that in 2008, states with EDR had a 10% higher voter turnout than those without EDR.
Compare voter turnout in 2012 In 2012: States with EDR: 65% States without EDR: 58%
The difference is 65% − 58% = 7% . This means that in 2012, states with EDR had a 7% higher voter turnout than those without EDR.
Draw a conclusion In both 2008 and 2012, the voter turnout was higher in states with EDR compared to states without EDR. Therefore, we can conclude that election-day registration helped to increase voter turnout.
Examples
Understanding the impact of policies like Election-Day Registration (EDR) is crucial for shaping effective strategies to boost voter participation. For instance, if a city council is debating whether to implement EDR, they can analyze data from other states to predict potential increases in voter turnout. This helps them make informed decisions about resource allocation and policy implementation, ensuring a more inclusive and representative democratic process. By studying the effects of EDR in different contexts, policymakers can tailor their approaches to maximize voter engagement and strengthen civic participation.
Election-Day Registration (EDR) has consistently resulted in higher voter turnout in states where it is offered. In both 2008 and 2012, states with EDR saw significantly more voters compared to those without it. Thus, the correct conclusion is that EDR helped to increase voter turnout.
;