In Gonzales v. Raich, the court reasoned that the private use of marijuana might have:
A. an adverse impact on federal drug laws.
B. a positive impact on federal drug laws.
C. an adverse impact on state drug laws.
D. a positive impact on state drug laws.
Answer (2)
The Supreme Court in Gonzales v. Raich determined that the private use of marijuana could adversely impact federal drug laws, leading to concerns over the federal government's capability to regulate controlled substances effectively. The ruling emphasized the primacy of federal authority in matters of drug regulation, even in the face of state laws allowing medical marijuana. This case illustrates the conflict between state and federal regulations regarding drug use. ;
In Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court found that the private use of marijuana could adversely impact federal drug laws, as it could undermine the federal government's efforts to regulate controlled substances. This case reinforced the idea that federal law supersedes state laws concerning drug regulation. The chosen option is A: an adverse impact on federal drug laws.
;
