What is the 'Bridge to Nowhere' controversy?
A. An example of legislative oversight wherein legislators in Alaska proposed constructing a costly bridge to a very small island of about 50 inhabitants.
B. An example of legislative predominance wherein legislators in Alaska proposed constructing a costly bridge to a very small island of about 50 inhabitants.
C. An example of pork barrel spending wherein legislators in Alaska proposed constructing a costly bridge to a very small island of about 50 inhabitants.

The 'Bridge to Nowhere' controversy is a notable example of pork barrel spending, involving a proposed bridge in Alaska for a small population. Criticism centered on the perceived waste of taxpayer funds, leading to the project's funding being revoked in 2009. This case illustrates the impact of public opinion on government spending decisions.
;

Answered by Anonymous | 2025-07-06

The 'Bridge to Nowhere' controversy in Alaska is a notable example of pork barrel spending involving a proposed bridge for a small population, sparking debates about government waste. It highlighted concerns over the appropriateness of governmental expenditures and legislative accountability. Ultimately, public opinion led to the project’s funding being revoked. ;

Answered by GinnyAnswer | 2025-07-06