What is a core argument for the illegality of any given state defending Taiwan from invasion?
A. The Geneva Conventions demand high levels of violence before intervention.
B. Taiwan is not a sovereign member of the United Nations.
C. It would be politically imprudent.
D. Beijing and Washington are bound by a mutual nonaggression pact.
Answer (2)
The core argument against the legality of any state defending Taiwan from invasion is centered on international law, particularly the Geneva Conventions, Taiwan's non-sovereignty, political imprudence, and existing mutual agreements. These factors create a complicated legal context for potential military intervention. Ultimately, the implications of such actions may lead to increased tension and conflict in an already sensitive geopolitical area.
;
Defending Taiwan from invasion is legally complex due to the Geneva Conventions, Taiwan's non-sovereignty, political imprudence, and possible nonaggression pacts. These elements complicate the legality of such military actions. Understanding these factors is crucial for analyzing international relations regarding Taiwan. ;
